History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mungin v. State
147 S.E. 807
Ga. Ct. App.
1929
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

The special- grounds of the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds; there is ample evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the judge who tried the case did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Henry O. Fair, for plaintiff in error. J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Mungin v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 9, 1929
Citation: 147 S.E. 807
Docket Number: 19544
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.