Appeal, No. 267 | Pa. | Oct 25, 1916

Per Curiam,

When this case was called for argument counsel for appellants stated they would waive the second question in their statement of questions involved. The first question was this day decided adversely to the appellants in Commonwealth, ex rel., Hughes, v. Gritman, et al., 255 Pa. 277" date_filed="1916-10-25" court="Pa." case_name="Commonwealth, ex rel. Hughes v. Gritman">255 Pa. 277, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.