History
  • No items yet
midpage
Munday v. Collier
52 Ark. 126
Ark.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Husband and Wife:Contracts: Practice. The question of the application of the sums claimed to have been paid by the defendant, Munday, to jjjs wjfg) was fairly submitted to the jury; and they found that the amounts, if paid, were not made as payments on the note, and their verdict is conclusive.

Whether the note constituted a legal liability or not, it was unquestionably an equitable claim against the husband. The error, if any, in bringing the action at law, was waived by the defendant’s failure to move a transfer to the proper docket. Organ v. Ry., 51 Ark., 235.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Munday v. Collier
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: May 15, 1889
Citation: 52 Ark. 126
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.