Mullins v. State ex rel. Pellicer, No. 41636

No. 41636 | Fla. | Nov 24, 1971

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner attacks, among other things, the constitutionality of Fla.Stat. § 398.22(1) (d) which we hereby deem and hold to be constitutional.

Petitioner’s remaining points are without merit, and the petition for writ of habe-as corpus is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.