History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mullins v. Rio Algom, Inc.
85 Ohio St. 3d 361
Ohio
1999
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, has certified the following question to us:

“Is Section 2745.01 of the Ohio Revised Code unconstitutional under state law thereby rendering Ohio Revised Code Section 2305.11.2 null and void?”

The certified question is answered in the affirmative on the authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107.

Case Details

Case Name: Mullins v. Rio Algom, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 28, 1999
Citation: 85 Ohio St. 3d 361
Docket Number: No. 97-2491
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.