75 W. Va. 783 | W. Va. | 1915
Decision in this case is completely controlled by our decision in Jarrell v. Laurel Coal and Land Company,, decided at this term. The cases are indeed identical, except that the plaintiffs are different. This suit is by one of the heirs of Simeon Jarrell, deceased, and her husband. They were plaintiffs in the other suit, hut upon their own motion were dismissed therefrom without prejudice. Then they brought this independent suit, making the same collateral attack with which we dealt in the other. Exactly the same facts are involved. All that we said in the opinion in the other case applies here.
It is suggested in the brief filed for plaintiffs that their bill may be considered as a bill to review thé old suit for the sale of the lands of Simeon Jarrell, deceased. It is said that disability of coverture has saved to plaintiffs the right to file a bill of review thereto. However that may be, the bill in this case in no way purports to be a bill of review. It is a bill collaterally attacking the decrees in the old suit as void for want of jurisdiction in the court to enter them, not a bill to review them for errors. It has neither the parties,
An order will be entered affirming the decree.
Affirmed.