History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mullins v. Commonwealth
2 Va. Dec. 666
Va.
1899
Check Treatment
Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion that the county court erred in permitting certain papers, purporting to be letters from the accused, to be read to the jury, as set out in bills of exceptions Nos. 1 and 2. They are immaterial, irrelevant, and should have been excluded. The evidence is so indecent that we shall not discuss it in detail, but will content ourselves with observing that it is wholly insufficient to maintain the verdict; and for the foregoing reasons the judgment of the county court must be reversed, the verdict of the jury set aside, and the case remanded for a new trial, to be had. therein in accordance with this opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Mullins v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Jul 11, 1899
Citation: 2 Va. Dec. 666
Court Abbreviation: Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.