History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mullen v. . Canal Co.
115 N.C. 15
N.C.
1894
Check Treatment

This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan,110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.

Petition dismissed.

Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503,511.

Case Details

Case Name: Mullen v. . Canal Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1894
Citation: 115 N.C. 15
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.