midpage

Mulet v. KellyMulet v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 11, 2008
Versions:49 A.D.3d 336
852 N.Y.2d 762

Credible evidence rebuts the World Trade Center presumption (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252.1 [1] [a]), assuming it applies, and supports the Medical Board‘s determination that petitioner‘s disability is not traumatic in origin (see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760-761 [1996]). We have considered petitioner‘s other arguments, including those based on the conflicting opinions of his psychiatrist and social worker, and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ. [See 2006 NY Slip Op 30186(U).]

Case Details

Case Name: Mulet v. Kelly
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 11, 2008
Citations: 49 A.D.3d 336; 852 N.Y.2d 762
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In