History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mueller v. Adler
260 U.S. 694
SCOTUS
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want .of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, 144; Apapas v. United States, 233 U. S. 587, 589; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 372; Public Service Co. v. Corboy, 250 U. S. 153, *695162; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166, 173.

Mr. William J. Hughes and Mr. Ephrim Caplan for appellants. Mr. Edward W. Foristel for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Mueller v. Adler
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 9, 1922
Citation: 260 U.S. 694
Docket Number: No. 376
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.