No. 376 | SCOTUS | Oct 9, 1922

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want .of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U.S. 137" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1913-04-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/bogart-v-southern-pacific-co-97837?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97837">228 U. S. 137, 144; Apapas v. United States, 233 U.S. 587" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1914-05-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/apapas-v-united-states-98182?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98182">233 U. S. 587, 589; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U.S. 369" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1914-06-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/louis--nash-rr-v-west-un-tel-co-98234?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98234">234 U. S. 369, 372; Public Service Co. v. Corboy, 250 U.S. 153" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1919-06-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/public-service-co-of-northern-ill-v-corboy-99407?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="99407">250 U. S. 153, *695162; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U.S. 166" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1920-12-06" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/de-rees-v-costaguta-99656?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="99656">254 U. S. 166, 173.

Mr. William J. Hughes and Mr. Ephrim Caplan for appellants. Mr. Edward W. Foristel for appellees.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.