The exception cannot be sustained. Griswold v. Chandler, 6 N.H. 61" court="None" date_filed="1832-10-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/griswold-v-chandler-8503850?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8503850">6 N.H. 61; Wendell v. French, 19 N.H. 205" court="None" date_filed="1848-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wendell-v-french-8505194?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8505194">19 N.H. 205, 214;
Mathes v. Bennett, 21 N.H. 188" court="None" date_filed="1850-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mathes-v-bennett-8505401?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8505401">21 N.H. 188, 203; Kingman v. Kingman, 31 N.H. 182" court="None" date_filed="1855-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/kingman-v-kingman-8506041?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8506041">31 N.H. 182, 192; Clarke v. Clay, 31 N.H. 393" court="None" date_filed="1855-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/clarke-v-clay-8506058?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8506058">31 N.H. 393, 404; Whitcher v. Benton, 50 N.H. 25" court="N.H." date_filed="1870-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/whitcher-v-benton-8047538?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8047538">50 N.H. 25; Olcott v. Thompson, 59 N.H. 154" court="N.H." date_filed="1879-06-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/olcott-v-thompson-3550870?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3550870">59 N.H. 154, 157; Nutter v. Varney, 64 N.H. 334" court="N.H." date_filed="1887-06-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/nutter-v-varney-3552294?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3552294">64 N.H. 334. The question of justice presented by the appellant's motion for costs, was a question of fact determinable at the trial term. The decision of that question required a consideration of evidence that is not stated in the case. It does not appear that wrong would have been done if the appellee had recovered a portion or the whole of his costs.
Exception overruled.
BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.