History
  • No items yet
midpage
MR v. State
2000 WL 1629302
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2000
|
Check Treatment
777 So. 2d 995 (2000)

M.R., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D99-4040.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 1, 2000.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

M.R. appeals the trial court's adjudication of delinquency for violating Tampa's juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code § 14-26(c) (1996). He argues that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm under the authority of this court's recent decisions in J.P. v. State, 775 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and State v. T.M., 761 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We again certify the following questions of great public importance:

WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT APPLY WHEN REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDNANCE?
WHETHER THE TAMPA JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE IS CONSTITUTIONAL?

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: MR v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 1, 2000
Citation: 2000 WL 1629302
Docket Number: 2D99-4040
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.