[["$","meta","0",{"name":"viewport","content":"width=device-width, initial-scale=1"}],["$","meta","1",{"charSet":"utf-8"}],["$","title","2",{"children":"Mower v. State Department of Health, 278 U.S. 570"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"description","content":"\n Read Mower v. State Department of Health, 278 U.S. 570 (SCOTUS 1928) for free with midpage's AI-powered interface. Search through and read midpage's comprehensive database of legal opinions.\n "}],["$","link","4",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/mower-v-state-department-of-health-8147098"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"47d9HJfzq2q0OP3ZqpopFxgpQIsT0oBkwtraeH2SIpE"}],["$","link","6",{"rel":"icon","href":"/midpage.png"}]] 8:null d:null 29:T5f4, Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421, 426; Capital Traction Co. v. Hof, 174 U. S. 1, 45; Bragg v. Weaver,

278 U.S. 570 | SCOTUS | 1928