History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mountain West Holding Co. v. State of Montana
14-36097
| 9th Cir. | Jun 27, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before: LEAVY and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ, [*] District Judge.

The final sentence on page 5, paragraph 3 of the Memorandum Disposition filed on May 16, 2017 is amended to read as follows: “Although the report was authenticated after it was filed, the district court made a reasonable decision to admit and consider it, and it seems Montana suffered no prejudice as a result.”

With that amendment, the panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Friedland has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Leavy and Benitez recommend denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are . No further petitions shall be entertained.

[*] The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Mountain West Holding Company’s request to designate the Memorandum Disposition for publication is also .

Case Details

Case Name: Mountain West Holding Co. v. State of Montana
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 27, 2017
Docket Number: 14-36097
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.