History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mountain v. Rowland & Ansley
30 Ga. 929
Ga.
1860
Check Treatment

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

By the Act of 1843, (Cobb’s Digest, 475) plaintiffs are authorized to dismiss their actions during the vacation of the Superior, Inferior, and other Courts, on the same terms they are now authorized to dismiss actions at the regular terms of said CourtsBrovided, That such dismissal shall be first entered on the docket by the Clerk of the Court in which said suit may be pending during the vacation of said Court.”

It is not denied but that all was done which the law requires to be done by the plaintiff in this case, but the Clerk, as he states, omitted to make the entry in his office as required by the statute. We think the Court was right in allowing the entry to be made nunc pro tunc.

Case Details

Case Name: Mountain v. Rowland & Ansley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1860
Citation: 30 Ga. 929
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.