History
  • No items yet
midpage
Motyka v. City of Amsterdam
179 N.Y.S.2d 924
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1958
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from judgment and order dismissing the complaint herein at the close of the plaintiffs’ case for failure of proof. The action was tried at a term of court in Montgomery County on February 7, 1957 before the Honorable Andrew W. Ryan. The action is in negligence. The city is charged with violation of the Multiple Residence Law and the individual owner with owning and maintaining a defective and unsafe building and allowing the use of a dangerous and defective instrument therein (oil stove), all of which created a nuisance. There is nothing in the present case as to the law or facts which differs from a case previously tried and dismissed and thereafter affirmed by this court. (Rivera v. City of Amsterdam, 5 A D 2d 637.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present—Foster, P. J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Motyka v. City of Amsterdam
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 2, 1958
Citation: 179 N.Y.S.2d 924
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.