History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mott v. Hurd
1 Root 73
Conn. Super. Ct.
1775
Check Treatment

*75In tliis case there was no written note or memorandum of tlie agreement and promise. A motion in arrest was made, 1st, That tlie parol agreement was absorbed by tlie giving of tlie deed; 2d, No time is set or person appointed, when, and by whom said land should be measured; 3d, That a special notice and request was necessary to entitle the plaintiff to an action, which is not laid in the declaration to have been given or made.

The court determined the motion to be insufficient and the plaintiff had judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Mott v. Hurd
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1775
Citation: 1 Root 73
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.