Mott v. Branham
50 S.E. 65
Ga.1905Check Treatment1. The judge presiding neither expressed nor intimated his opinion as to what had been proved. He fully and fairly stated to the jury the issues in the ease and the respective contentions of the parties, and properly instructed the jury as to the law applicable to the evidence.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.