History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mote v. State
29 S.E.2d 661
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1944
|
Check Treatment

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on all assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 19, 1944. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 4, 1944.

Case Details

Case Name: Mote v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 19, 1944
Citation: 29 S.E.2d 661
Docket Number: 30368.
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.