History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mosseau v. Landy
177 Mass. 104
Mass.
1900
Check Treatment
Hammond, J.

The only question is whether there was error prejudicial to the defendant in the exclusion of the question put to Bassett as to the value of the extra work done by the plaintiff.

The bill of exceptions fails to show what the answer would have been, or what the defendant offered or expected to prove by it. We cannot say, therefore, that the defendant has been harmed by the exclusion of the question. Farnum v. Pitcher, 151 Mass. 470.

Fxceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Mosseau v. Landy
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 19, 1900
Citation: 177 Mass. 104
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.