History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moss v. Birch
102 Ga. 556
Ga.
1897
Check Treatment
Little, J.

Where in a bill of exceptions the only error assigned is that the presiding judge refused to grant aii injunction, and the evidence upon which such refusal was had, being documentary, is set out in full in the bill of exceptions, without any attempt whatever to brief the same having been made as required by the act approved November 11, 1889, but including immaterial and unnecessary portions of many of the documents, according to repeatedrulingsof this court the evidence so incorporated in the bill *557of exceptions will not be considered; and there being no question for decision which arises on the pleadings in the case, the judgment below is

Submitted April 20, Decided May 19, 1897. II. B. Moss, for plaintiff. II. N. Holland, for defendants.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Moss v. Birch
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 19, 1897
Citation: 102 Ga. 556
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.