History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mosness v. Lacy
73 Minn. 283
Minn.
1898
Check Treatment
BUCK, J.

This is an action to set aside the record of a foreclosure sale by advertisement, and the question involved is the validity of the postponement of the sale from the time fixed in the original advertisement, viz., August 10, 1895, to August 24, 1895.

The record does not show that the sale was not duly postponed. The sale itself was made by the sheriff in the manner provided by *285statute, and the certificate thereof contained the requirements of the law. As this certificate, under G-. S. 1894, § 6054, is prima facie evidence that all the requirements of law in that behalf were duly complied with, the postponement and sale must be deemed valid.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mosness v. Lacy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 12, 1898
Citation: 73 Minn. 283
Docket Number: Nos. 11,154-(243)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.