History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.
72 N.Y.2d 945
NY
1988
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order of the Appellate Division insofar as it granted summary judgment to defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (137 AD2d 170) addressing that portion of the litigation; appeal from so much of the order insofar as it denied plaintiffs’ *948motion for summary judgment against defendants Seiger & Smith, Inc., and Vasaka dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action between the affected parties within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case Details

Case Name: Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 20, 1988
Citation: 72 N.Y.2d 945
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.