650 N.E.2d 189 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1994
Plaintiff-appellant, Scott Moshier, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the summary judgment motion of defendant-appellee, Jeg's High Performance Centers, Inc. Plaintiff's single assignment of error states:
"The trial court erred in granting summary judgment on appellant's claim under O.R.C. §
On May 17, 1993, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant. Under the first count of the complaint, plaintiff asserted that defendant violated R.C.
Following service on defendant, defendant filed an answer, and ultimately a motion for summary judgment. In its motion, defendant contended that plaintiff was not entitled to the protections afforded by R.C.
Plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the trial court's determination that plaintiff presented no viable claim under R.C.
R.C.
"If an employee becomes aware in the course of his employment of a violation by a fellow employee of any state or federal statute, any ordinance or regulation of a political subdivision, or any work rule or company policy of his employer and the employee reasonably believes that the violation either is a criminal offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to persons or a hazard to public health or safety or is a felony, the employee orally shall notify his supervisoror other responsible officer of his employer of the violationand subsequently shall file with that supervisor or officer awritten report that provides sufficient detail to identify anddescribe the violation." (Emphasis added.)
Here, the parties agree that plaintiff orally notified defendant of the alleged felony theft, but failed to follow up his oral report with the written report required under the statute. Relying on Bear v. Geetronics, Inc. (1992),
Plaintiff's contentions invite us to rewrite the statute, and we decline. R.C.
R.C.
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's single assignment of error is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
CLOSE and CACIOPPO, JJ., concur.
MARY CACIOPPO, J., retired, of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.