History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mosher v. Lustick
66 Colo. 455
Colo.
1919
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Denison.

The defendant in error moves to strike the bill of exceptions, on the ground that it was not filed in time. It was filed within an extension of time, but there was no notice of motion for extension. The motion to strike must be granted.

In re Luthe’s Will, Ransom v. Holland,, No. 9546, decided herewith. 66 Colo. 420.

Motion to strike bill of exceptions granted.

Garrigues, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mosher v. Lustick
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: Apr 15, 1919
Citation: 66 Colo. 455
Docket Number: No. 9517
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.