Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that while the charge of the court respecting the moral obligation of the defendant to care for the child was improper under the-circumstances of this case, it was not so prejudicial as to require a new trial. All concurred.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
