History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moses & Moses v. Mead
5 Denio 617
Court for the Trial of Impeach...
1846
Check Treatment

*618Senators Weight and Porter delivered written opinions in favor of affirming the judgment, upon substantially the same reasons contained in the opinion of Chief Justice Bronson, recognizing the distinction between the application of the rule of an implied warranty to provisions sold for consumption by the purchaser, and those sold as merchandise.

Senators Hard and Barlow delivered written opinions for reversal, upon the ground that the exception to the rule of caveat emptor is applicable to the sale of all articles of food for mankind, in whatever quantities, from motives of safety to the public health.

Senators Lott and J. B. Smith also delivered written opinions for affirmance, and Senators Williams, Johnson and Folsom for reversal.

Senator Hand delivered an oral opinion for reversal.

Upon the question being put, “ Shall this judgment be reversed?” the members of the court voted as follows :

For reversal: Senators Barlow, Denniston, Emmons, Folsom, Hand, Hard, Johnson, Scovil, Wheeler, Williams—10.

For affirmance: The President, and Senators Burnham, Deyo, Lester, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, J. B. Smith, Talcott, Wright—10.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Moses & Moses v. Mead
Court Name: Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Date Published: Dec 15, 1846
Citation: 5 Denio 617
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.