History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moser v. Matt
24 Ill. 198
Ill.
1860
Check Treatment
Breese, J.

We see nothing in this case to take it out of the cases heretofore decided by this court. It is essential, a definite time shall be alleged for the completion of the work. We cannot imply a time. We adhere to the opinions and rulings in Cook v. Heald, 21 Ill. R. 425; Same v. Vreeland, ib. 431; Cook v. Rofinot, ib. 437; Senior v. Brebnor, 22 Ill. R. 252; McClurken et al. v. Logan et al., 23 ib. 79. We can see no difference in principle between the cases, and deem it useless to go again into the argument.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Moser v. Matt
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1860
Citation: 24 Ill. 198
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.