History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moseley v. Heney
66 Cal. 478
Cal.
1885
Check Treatment
Myrick, J.

Action to recover an alleged indebtedness due from defendant’s testator. Causes of action are separately stated in the complaint. Following these allegations is an allegation of the death of the testator, and of the proceedings in probate. Objection is made that the allegations as to the death and the proceedings in probate are not separately stated in each count. The point is not well taken. The allegations may be considered as referring to either and both of the counts.

The subject of the action was community property ; no such agreement existed between plaintiff and his wife as made the proceeds of her labor her separate property; therefore, the husband was the proper plaintiff. Such being the case, the wife was not incompetent as a witness, under the code.

We think the findings were sustained by the evidence; we see no error. On the contrary, there is no merit in the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Sharpstein, J. and Thornton, J., concurred,.

Case Details

Case Name: Moseley v. Heney
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 5, 1885
Citation: 66 Cal. 478
Docket Number: No. 8,878
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.