History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Horkan
890 N.Y.S.2d 326
N.Y. App. Div.
2009
Check Treatment

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, v ROSALIE HORKAN et al., Defendants. IPA ASSET MANAGEMENT II, LLC, Nonparty Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department

890 N.Y.S.2d 326

Following a foreclosure auction conducted on March 26, 2007, the highest bidder at the auction defaulted by failing to appear for a scheduled closing. The plaintiff, who was the second highest bidder at the auction, moved, inter alia, for an order directing the transfer of title of the subject premises to Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., as the plaintiff‘s ultimate assignee. Under the unique circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiff‘s motion. A foreclosure action is equitable in nature and triggers the equitable powers of the court (see Notey v Darien Constr. Corp., 41 NY2d 1055, 1055-1056 [1977]). “Once equity is invoked, the court‘s power is as broad as equity and justice require” (Norstar Bank v Morabito, 201 AD2d 545, 546 [1994]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Covello and Austin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Horkan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 2009
Citation: 890 N.Y.S.2d 326
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In