History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morrison v. Shipman
37 Wash. 171
Wash.
1905
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a tax judgment. It appears that one Emily Shipman was the owner of the property in con*172troversv, prior to her decease in the year 1895. For the year 1898, the property was assessed to unknown owners, and a certificate of delinquency was issued for the taxes of that year. The certificate stated that the owner was unknown. The action brought to foreclose this certificate of delinquency was against Emily L. Shippen, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property. It is conceded that, if the foreclosure proceedings had been instituted against an unknown owner, the judgment would be valid; but it is claimed that, by reason of the .fact that such proceedings were against Emily L. Shippen, a stranger to the title, and all persons unknown, if any, having or claiming an interest in the property, such proceedings are void and should be set aside. If a tax foreclosure against an unknown owner is valid — and this court has so held in case the property is assessed to an unknown owner — it would seem to follow as a matter of course that a proceeding against an unknown owner and others would be equally valid.

The appeal is without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morrison v. Shipman
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 23, 1905
Citation: 37 Wash. 171
Docket Number: No. 5452
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.