History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morrison v. California
288 U.S. 591
SCOTUS
1933
Check Treatment

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178, 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502. (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258, 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225, 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Morrison v. California
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 20, 1933
Citation: 288 U.S. 591
Docket Number: No. 662
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.