| N.J. | Mar 15, 1894

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Smith. 12.

For reversal—Rone.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.