History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morrill v. Warner
66 N.H. 572
| N.H. | 1891
|
Check Treatment

The exceptions present no question of law. Whether justice required that the trial should be stopped, and whether, by reason of the proximity of the places, proof of the state of the weather in one town had a tendency to show what it was in the other, were questions of fact to be determined at the trial term. Temple v. Sumner, Smith (N.H.) 226; State v. Howard,17 N.H. 171, 186; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N.H. 158; Norton v. Wilbur, 5 Gray 7; State v. Boston Maine Railroad, 58 N.H. 410, 412; Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. Head, 59 N.H. 332, 338; Tilton v. Society, 60 N.H. 377, 384; Cook v. New Durham, 64 N.H. 419; Smith v. Earle, 118 Mass. 531.

Exceptions overruled.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Morrill v. Warner
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1891
Citation: 66 N.H. 572
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.