History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morrill v. Madden
37 Minn. 282
Minn.
1887
Check Treatment
By the Court.

This ease, as now presented by an amended complaint, is deemed to be in no essential respect different from that-shown by the original complaint, which, upon a former appeal, was-decided to be insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a remedy upon a judgment, after it had been suffered to expire by lapse of time. Mor*283rill v. Madden, 35 Minn. 493, (29 N. W. Rep. 193.) For reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order sustaining this demurrer is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morrill v. Madden
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 25, 1887
Citation: 37 Minn. 282
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.