Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 31, 1976, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Plaintiff-appellant doing business under the name Bi-Lingual Agency commenced this action and also filed complaints with the Commissioner of Consumer Affairs charging defendants-respondents with violating section 187 of the General Business Law by use of the word "bi-lingual” in their advertising so as to cause confusion with appellant’s name. The court below dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and we affirm for the reasons stated by that court and upon the additional authority of Greater New York Mut. Ins. Co. v Wehinger Serv. (NYLJ, May 14, 1974, p 2, col 2, affd
Morin v. Curtis Associates Personnel, Inc.
393 N.Y.S.2d 16
N.Y. App. Div.1977Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
