History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. Van Ingen
2 Johns. 204
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1807
Check Treatment
Fer Curiam.

The defendant, as a notary, was bound only to demand payment of the note, and to make his protest in case of non-payment. It was no part of his official duty to give the notice to the indorsers. His special undertaking to Atlcinson, that he would give such notice, will not enure to the benefit of the plaintiff. The promise was to Atlcinson, who has no further claim or demand, nor any cause of action against the defendant, since he has been paid the full amount of the note.

Rule refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. Van Ingen
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1807
Citation: 2 Johns. 204
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.