Morgan v. Susino Construction Co.
131 N.J.L. 329
N.J.
1944
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the *Page 330 statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N.J.L. 455.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 10.

For reversal — HEHER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3. *Page 331