History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. State
414 So. 2d 233
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1982
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), has taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The motion to vacate, the files and record in this case fail to conclusively show the petitioner is not entitled to relief, and he is therefore entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 3.850 motion. See, Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1982), 7 FLW 186; Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977); Cole v. State, 181 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Holzapfel v. State, 120 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary hearing.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 4, 1982
Citation: 414 So. 2d 233
Docket Number: No. 82-678
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.