History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. State
40 S.E. 242
Ga.
1901
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the charges complained of, even if erroneous for the reasons assigned in the motion for a new trial, did not, in view of the facts disclosed by the record, contain any error of which the accused can complain. The charges in question really gave the accused the benefit'd a theory which the evidence did not authorize.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent. Accusation of misdemeanor. Before Judge Calhoun. Criminal court of Atlanta. October 5, 1901. S. G. Grane, for plaintiff in error. B. B. Black, solicitor, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 20, 1901
Citation: 40 S.E. 242
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.