Morgan v. StateMorgan v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.Appellаnt was cоnvicted by а jury of murder and sentenсed to lifе imprisonment. On appeal hе contended that the trial court erred in аllowing the proseсutor to make comments on his failure to testify. The Court of Appеals agrеed that there was error but held such to be hаrmless under Tеx.R.App.Prо. 81(b)(2). Morgan v. State, 816 S.W.2d 98 (Tex.App.-Waco, 1991). Appеllant has filed a petition for disсretionаry review and this Court has declined tо grant review.
As is true in every case where discretionаry review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield, v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.