History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. Reintzel
11 U.S. 273
| SCOTUS | 1812
|
Check Treatment
11 U.S. 273 (1812)
7 Cranch 273

MORGAN
v.
REINTZEL.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 9, 1812.
March 13, 1812.

Present ... . All the Judges.

*275 The Defendant took out a writ of error; and the cause was now submitted to this Court by F.S. KEY for Plaintiff in error, and MORSELL for Defendant, without argument.

All the Judges being present.

MARSHALL, Ch. J. after stating the case, observed that the Court could see no error in the judgment.

The payment of the money by the Plaintiff, under the circumstances stated in the count, was a sufficient consideration for the assumpsit.

The principal objection was that the count ought to have been founded upon the note, so as to oblige the Plaintiff to produce it on the trial. But it states that *276 the note was paid by the Plaintiff; and the Court thinks that the note must have been produced upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. Reintzel
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 13, 1812
Citation: 11 U.S. 273
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.