History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. Morgan
21 A.D.3d 1068
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are the rightful owners of certain real property, the defendants appeal from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 10, 2003, which after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that the plaintiff Kay Morgan was the sole title holder of the subject real property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants waived the assertion of the affirmative defen*1069ses of laches, unclean hands, and equitable estoppel by not raising them in the pleadings (see CPLR 3018 [b]; Fade v Pugliani/ Fade, 8 AD3d 612, 614-615 [2004]; Kromer v Kromer, 177 AD2d 472, 473 [1991]). In any event, there was sufficient proof adduced at trial for the Supreme Court, as the trier of fact, to conclude that the elements of the asserted defenses were not established.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. Morgan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 26, 2005
Citation: 21 A.D.3d 1068
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.