Morgan v. Mastick
17 F. Cas. 752
N.D. Ohio
1869
Check Treatment
SHERMAN, District Judge,

held that the decision in 8 Mete. [Mass.] 377, was a correct statement of the law of the case, and as such read it in full to the jury.

The jury could not agree as to the intent; while all were unanimous as to the defendant being insolvent, ten of them regarded the intent as fraudulent, and two that it was not. They were therefore discharged.