History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. England
1 Ohio Ch. 112
Ohio
1832
Check Treatment
BY THE COURT.

Usurious contracts have never been rendered void in Ohio; the authorities cited are applicable to contracts made void by the usury laws of other countries, and have no application here. But if otherwise, the matter set up in the bill might have availed the party at law, if the law made the contract void, as contended. Having neglected to make the defence there, he cannot, without excuse, come here to set it up.

The bill is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. England
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1832
Citation: 1 Ohio Ch. 112
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.