History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc.
196 S.E. 307
N.C.
1938
Check Treatment

The defendant appealed from an order of the court below making additional parties defendant. The power of the judge to make additional parties to an action is well settled, and it does not appear that the order appealed from will change the cause of action or work injustice to the appellant. Tillery v. Candler, 118 N.C. 888, 24 S.E. 709; Mills v.Callahan, 126 N.C. 756, 36 S.E. 164; Bernard v. Shemwell, 139 N.C. 446,52 S.E. 64; Joyner v. Fiber Co., 178 N.C. 634, *Page 426 101 S.E. 373; Barbee v. Cannady, 191 N.C. 529, 132 S.E. 281;Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 197, 185 S.E. 767.

As was said in Bernard v. Shemwell, supra, "It can very rarely happen that making an additional party will be a serious prejudice, and hence such orders are usually discretionary and not reviewable."

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 13, 1938
Citation: 196 S.E. 307
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.