History
  • No items yet
midpage
Morgan-Gardner Electric Co. v. Brown
193 Pa. 351
Pa.
1899
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the very able argument of counsel in support of the plaintiff company’s contentions we are not convinced that there is any substantial error in the rulings of the learned president of the common pleas; and for reasons given in his opinion on the questions of law reserved, the judgment in the defendant’s favor non obstante veredicto is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Morgan-Gardner Electric Co. v. Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 30, 1899
Citation: 193 Pa. 351
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 59
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.