History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moreland v. State
139 S.E. 361
Ga. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment
Bloodworth; J.

The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled.

2. Tо a question certified to it by this court the Supreme Cоurt answered as follows: “Two men, on a rainy day, were traveling ‍‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‍in an automobile on a public highway in this Statе. One was the owner of the car, and the other was the owner’s chauffeur, *181who was driving. While the automobilе was moving .at the rate of fifty miles an hour, and as it approached a sharp curve on the highway аnd on the wrong side of the highway, at the same unlawful rate of speed, it collided with another automobile which was being driven in the opposite direction, and the collision caused the death of a womаn who was riding in the latter car. At the scene of the сollision, and almost immediately thereafter, the сhauffeur stated that he lost control of the cаr when he attempted to wipe the rain off the windshield. The owner and the chauffeur were both indicted fоr murder, and the owner was put upon trial and convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act; the chauffeur ‍‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‍not being apprehended. The evidence authorized a finding that the woman wаs killed by the chauffeur, the operator of the automobile, without intention to do so, but in the commission оf an unlawful act which in its consequences did not naturally tend to destroy a human being. There was no evidence authorizing a finding that the owner was operating thе automobile at any time, or.that he directed thе chauffeur in the operation, or aided, abetted, or concurred in the unlawful manner in which the cаr was operated, except the following fаcts: The owner was riding in the car while his chauffeur was driving it in an unlawful manner, as stated. About five minutes after the cоllision the owner said to the chauffeur, ‘We must catch the train and get away from here;’ and the chauffeur soon afterwards left the scene and has never bеen apprehended. About an hour after the collision the owner appeared at 'the rаilroad office in Marietta and bought two tickets to Chattanooga. ‍‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‍Another man was with him. The next train left for Chattanooga about fifteen minutes afterwards. About three hours after this train left Marietta, the owner was arrested in a taxicab near Marietta, and while being driven towards that city. Held, that a verdict finding the owner guilty. of involuntary manslaughter in the ‍‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‍commission of an unlawful act was authorized as a matter of law.” 164 Ga. 467 (139 S. E. 77).

3. As far as they рroperly present any questions for determinatiоn by this court which are not settled by the foregoing ‍‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‍answer to the question certified to the Supreme Court, there is no merit in any of the other assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Buhe, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Moreland v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 28, 1927
Citation: 139 S.E. 361
Docket Number: 17543
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.