Morel v. City of New YorkMorel v. City of New York
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland De-Grasse, J.), entered on or about March 3, 1992, which, inter alia, granted defendant Terminus’ motion for summary judgment as against defendant Cohen’s to the extent that if plaintiff prevails on her claim and Terminus is found liable to plaintiff, Terminus is entitled to indemnification from and judgment over against Cohen’s, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
While Cohen’s maintains that an issue of fact exists as to where plaintiff fell, it is clear from the evidence that the site of plaintiff’s trip and fall was on the sidewalk adjacent to Cohen’s.
Summary judgment was appropriate as to Terminus’ cross claim against Cohen’s based upon the provisions of the lease agreement between the parties. The unambiguous lease, be
When one sophisticated commercial entity agrees to indemnify another through the employment of insurance, that agreement is enforceable. (Kinney v Lisk Co.,