History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moran v. Fox
1918 N.H. LEXIS 47
| N.H. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

The question raised by the defendant's exception is not whether the remarks excepted to were prejudicial, as a matter of law, but whether there is any evidence to warrant the court's finding that they rendered the trial unfair. Instead of there being no evidence to sustain the finding that they were prejudicial, that is the only conclusion of which the evidence is fairly capable. The question whether they produced the verdict is not now before this court, for the evidence relevant to that issue is not made a part of the case.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Moran v. Fox
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Nov 6, 1918
Citation: 1918 N.H. LEXIS 47
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.